| ICD-116B65 | PARTIAL DISSOCIATIVE IDENTITY DISORDERPartial dissociative identity disorder |
| ICD-10F44.8 | Other dissociative [conversion] disorders |
| DSM-5-TRF44.89 | Other Specified Dissociative Disorder |
1. Definition and nosology
Partial Dissociative Identity Disorder (ICD-11: 6B65 Partial Dissociative Identity Disorder) — similar to DID (6B64), but differs in that non-dominant identities do not consistently fully occupy the patient's behaviour or conscious function. Instead, non-dominant identities interfere, but do not fully seize “executive control.”
In ICD-11, added for the first time as an official diagnostic category; not separate in DSM-5-TR (in DSM-5-TR can be assessed under Other Specified Dissociative Disorder).
2. History
- ICD-11 (2019) — recognition as part of the DID spectrum, with the partial form as an official category.
- New diagnostic framework for conditions recognized in clinical practice as ‘DDNOS’ or ‘DID-NOS’.
3. Epidemiology
- Prevalence, precise data limited — believed to be more common than DID.
- Develops on trauma basis.
- Comorbidity resembling DID.
4. Aetiology and pathogenesis
Same as DID — severe childhood trauma, disorganized attachment, neurobiological dissociative processes.
5. Clinical features
- Two or more distinct identity states.
- Non-dominant identities intrude — internal voices, thoughts, feelings, actions – but do not fully occupy patient's behavior and consciousness.
- Dominant identity controls daily functioning.
- Less amnesia compared to DID.
- Distress and functional impairment.
6. Diagnosis
6.1 Unified diagnostic criteria (ICD-11)
A. Two or more distinct identity states.
B. Non-dominant identities do not consistently take full control; of the consciousness and behaviour of the dominant identity; but are present as an intrusive experience.
C. Significant distress or functional impairment.
D. Exclusion of substance or medical condition.
6.2 Source-specific clarifications
- ICD-11 — differs from DID by ‘not fully capturing.’
- DSM-5-TR — may be assessed within Other Specified Dissociative Disorder (F44.89).
6.3 Diagnostic algorithm
Same as DID (see 6B64 §6.3).
6.4 Differential diagnosis
| Condition | Distinguishing feature |
|---|---|
| DID (6B64) | Non-dominant identities consistently seize dominant control + amnesia. |
| PTSD / cPTSD (6B40/6B41) | Traumatic intrusions; no separate identities. |
| BPD (6D10.x) | Emotional lability dominant. |
| Schizophrenia (6A20) | Psychotic symptoms. |
| Possession trance (cultural) | Cultural and religious context. |
7. Examination and assessment
Same as DID (SCID-D-R, DES, MID).
8. Treatment
The phase-oriented approach is adapted for DID (ISSTD 2011). For treatment principles, phases, and specific methodologies, see section 6B64 “Treatment” (including “Treatment methods”).
9. Prognosis
Functional recovery with phase-oriented therapy; similar to DID.
10. Myths and misconceptions
Myth 1: “Partial DID is a ‘mild form’ of DID”
Evidence: distinct diagnostic category; functional impairment and trauma burden may be comparable to DID.
Myth 2: “Internal voices are always a psychotic symptom”
Evidence: dissociative voices differ from psychotic symptoms — internal dialogue, ‘own’ feeling, weak response to antipsychotics; SCID-D-R for differentiation.
Myth 3: “Antipsychotic ‘cures’ voices in partial DID”
Evidence: dissociative voices do not respond to antipsychotics; psychotherapy first-line.
Myth 4: “The patient is ‘role-playing’”
Evidence: Different from factitious disorder (6D50) — no motivation for gain; clinical experience is distressing for the patient.
11. Sources
- WHO. ICD-11. 6B65 Partial dissociative identity disorder. 2024.
- APA. DSM-5-TR. 2022.
- ISSTD. Guidelines for Treating Dissociative Identity Disorder in Adults, Third Revision. J Trauma Dissociation 2011;12(2):115–187.
- Reinders A.A.T.S. et al. J Nerv Ment Dis 2016;204(6):445–457.