| ICD-118A05.0 | PRIMARY TICS OR TIC DISORDERSPrimary tics or tic disorders |
| ICD-10F95.2 | Combined vocal and multiple motor tic disorder [de la Tourette] |
| DSM-5-TRF95.2 | Tourette's Disorder (and other tic disorders F95.0–F95.1) |
1. Definition and nosology
Tic disorders (ICD-11: 8A05.0 Primary Tics or Tic Disorders; DSM-5-TR: F95.0–F95.2) — a group of neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by sudden, rapid, recurrent, nonrhythmic, involuntary or semi-voluntary motor movements and/or vocal/sound productions. Tics are typically accompanied by a premonitory urge (an urge or tension) and can be voluntarily suppressed for a short period.
Three main categories in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR:
- Tourette syndrome (DSM-5-TR F95.2) — multiple motor tics and one or several vocal tics lasting ≥1 year, onset before age 18
- Persistent (chronic) motor or vocal tic disorder (DSM-5-TR F95.1) — motor or vocal (but not both) ≥ 1 year;
- Transient tic disorder (DSM-5-TR F95.0) — tic (motor and/or vocal) < 1 year, onset up to 18 years.
2. History
- Itard J.M.G. (1825) — the first clinical description of motor and vocal tics in Marquise de Dampierre.
- Gilles de la Tourette G. (1885) — Classical description of 9 patients at Salpêtrière hospital under Charcot's direction; name of the syndrome.
- 1960s — psychoanalytic explanation was dominant (‘neurotic disorder’).
- 1961 (Seignot J.N.) — the first clinical use of haloperidol revealed its effect in tics — basis for transition to neurobiological concept.
- DSM-III (1980) and subsequent revisions — formal status of tics as a medical disorder.
- AAN 2019 (Pringsheim T. et al. Neurology 2019;92(19)) — international evidence-based clinical guideline; emphasized that α2-agonists are first-line compared to antipsychotics due to more favorable side effect profile.
- ESSTS — European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome — European Clinical Guidelines (2011, updated 2022).
3. Epidemiology
- Tourette syndrome prevalence: in children 0.5–1% (Knight T. et al. systematic review Pediatr Neurol 2012).
- Persistent motor or vocal tic: ~1–2%.
- Transient tics: Up to 20% of school-age children.
- Sex: Higher by 3–4 times in males.
- Age of onset: 5–7 years; peak severity at 10–12 years.
- Persistence: In adulthood, tics significantly decrease in ~50%, persist in ~30%, and severe form remains in ~20% (Bloch M.H., Leckman J.F. J Psychosom Res 2009).
- Comorbidity: ADHD 50–60%, OCD 30–50%, anxiety 30%, depression 20%, learning disorder 20–30%, angry outbursts, sleep disorders.
4. Aetiology and pathogenesis
4.1 Genetic factors
- Heritability: 0.77 (Mataix-Cols D. et al. JAMA Psychiatry 2015 family and twin studies, n>200 000 Sweden) — among the most heritable psychiatric disorders.
- Polygenic nature: GWAS (Yu D. et al. Am J Psychiatry 2019) — risk loci identified; no single gene.
- Rare mutations: SLITRK1, HDC (histidine decarboxylase), CELSR3 — in a small number of families.
- High density of OCD and ADHD in family history — genetic overlap.
4.2 Neurobiological mechanisms
- Cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuit dysfunction — disruption of motor inhibition in basal ganglia and related regions (Leckman J.F. et al. Neuron 2000;28(2):349–354).
- Dopaminergic system hyperactivity — mechanism of tic reduction by dopamine antagonists (haloperidol, risperidone).
- Histaminergic system — HDC mutations rare; histaminergic tone low.
- Structural changes: Reduction in caudate volume, sensorimotor cortical thinning (Sowell E.R. et al. Nat Neurosci 2008).
4.3 Environmental factors (modifier)
- Preterm birth, perinatal hypoxia — moderately increases risk.
- Maternal tobacco use during pregnancy.
- Psychosocial stress — is not a cause for the onset of tics, but influences severity.
- PANDAS / PANS (Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal infections / Pediatric Acute-onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome) — rare; most cases are actually typical Tourette/OCD (see expanded §10).
5. Clinical features
5.1 Motor tics
- Simple motor tics: Eye blinking (most frequent onset), nose sniffing, head shaking, shoulder shrugging, lip play.
- Complex motor tics: Sequential movements — hopping, touching, spinning on the spot; rarely an obscene gesture (copropraxia, ~5%).
5.2 Vocal/phonic tics
- Simple vocal tic: coughing, sniffling, wheezing, throat clearing, shouting.
- Complex vocal: word, echolalia (repetition of others' words), palilalia (repetition of own words).
- Coprolalia (obscene word/phrase) — occurs in 19.3% of males and 14.6% of females with Tourette syndrome (Freeman R.D. et al. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009 international Tourette database, n=597), and differs from the portrayal in mass media.
5.3 Premonitory urge and voluntary suppression
Most patients experience a premonitory urge before tics (somatic urge, tension) is noted; the tic temporarily relieves this sensation. Tics can be voluntarily suppressed for a short period (seconds to minutes), but this suppression creates internal tension and discomfort — the subsequent tic episode is usually more intense.
5.4 Course and variability
- tics “Waxing and waning” — severity waxes and wanes; one tic type replaced by another.
- Triggers — stress (positive or negative), excitement, fatigue, specific contexts (e.g., suppressing tics at school).
- Tics decrease during sleep, but do not completely disappear.
- Peak severity at ages 10–12; decreases in most patients during adolescence.
6. Diagnosis
6.1 Unified diagnostic criteria (DSM-5-TR · ICD-11 · AAN 2019 consensus points)
For Tourette syndrome:
- Multiple motor tics and one or several vocal tics (occurring at different times, not required to be present simultaneously)
- Tics persist for at least 1 year (they may vary over time).
- Onset Up to 18 years.
- Exceptions — not fully explained by substance (e.g., cocaine) or medical condition (Huntington's, postviral encephalitis).
Persistent motor or vocal tic disorder: Same criteria as Tourette, but single type tic (motor or vocal, not both).
Transient tic disorder: Same criteria as Tourette, but duration < 1 il.
6.2 Source-specific clarifications
- DSM-5-TR: Three separate categories (F95.0, F95.1, F95.2). “Functional impairment” and “severity” were not included in the diagnostic requirement — merely meeting the criteria is diagnostically sufficient; however, the intervention decision is based on functional impairment.
- ICD-11 (8A05.0): “Primary tics or tic disorders” — sub-specifications: Tourette, persistent, provisional.
- AAN 2019 (Pringsheim T. et al.): the diagnosis is clinical, video recordings are an adjunct; YGTSS (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale) for baseline measurement and follow-up; comorbidity (ADHD, OCD) must be assessed.
- ESSTS 2022 (Müller-Vahl K.R. et al.): In the European context — same criteria; accepts CBIT as first-line non-pharmacological intervention.
6.3 Diagnostic algorithm
- Parent and patient interview — onset age, course, triggers, premonitory feeling.
- Video recordings — episodes captured at home by family (in clinic context tics often diminish)
- Standardized scale— YGTSS (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, baseline measures and monitoring).
- Comorbidity screening — ADHD (Conners, Vanderbilt), OCD (CY-BOCS), anxiety, depression, learning disorder, sleep.
- Neurological examination — focal signs, exclusion of choreoathetosis.
- Specific clinical suspicion — Huntington's disease (HTT gene), Wilson's disease (ceruloplasmin, copper), neuroacanthocytosis.
- PANDAS/PANS suspicion — only if classic clinical picture (rapid onset, OCD + tics + emotional lability post-streptococcal); routine antistreptolysin O tests are not recommended (NIMH 2017).
6.4 Differential diagnosis
| Condition | Distinguishing features |
|---|---|
| Stereotyped movement disorder (6A06) | Rhythmic, longer-lasting (seconds-minutes), no premonitory urge; onset <3 years. |
| Myoclonus | Brief, sudden, involuntary, no premonitory sensation; neurological etiology. |
| Choreoathetosis, dystonia | Persistent involuntary movements; cannot be suppressed; neurological examination. |
| OCD (6B20) — compulsions | Ego-dystonic purposeful sequences; response to obsession. Comorbid is common. |
| Functional tic (functional tic-like behavior) | Rapid onset in adulthood, complex bizarre patterns, coping from mass media; increase observed during COVID-19 (Pringsheim T. et al. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2021) |
| PANDAS/PANS | Rapid onset post-streptococcal; OCD + tics co-occurrence outbreak; rare. |
| Seizure (epileptic) | Alteration in consciousness; EEG. |
| Wilson's disease | Hepatic and neurological symptoms; Kayser-Fleischer rings, decreased ceruloplasmin. |
| Huntington's disease | Typical onset in adulthood; chorea, cognitive decline, family history. |
7. Examination and assessment
7.1 Clinical scales
- YGTSS (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, Leckman J.F. et al. 1989) — separate for motor and vocal tics; frequency, intensity, complexity, interference, number on a 0–5 scale; global impairment 0–50. Baseline measures and treatment monitoring.
- PUTS (Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale).
- CY-BOCS — comorbid condition assessment.
- Conners-3, Vanderbilt — comorbid ADHD.
7.2 Laboratory investigations
No specific laboratory indication for routine tics. Based on clinical suspicion:
- Thyroid function (TSH) — in hyperthyroidism context.
- Ceruloplasmin, 24-hour urine copper — suspicion of Wilson's disease (especially hepatic or movement adjunct).
- HTT — suspected Huntington (family history).
- Streptococcal antibodies (ASO, anti-DNase B) - only if classic PANDAS clinical picture present; not recommended routinely.
7.3 Instrumental investigations
- EEG — only if seizure suspected.
- Brain MRI — focal neurological signs, atypical clinical picture.
- Routine neuroimaging for tics is not recommended.
8. Treatment
8.1 General principles (AAN 2019 · ESSTS 2022 consensus)
- Intervention decision based on functional impairment — mild tics may be observed; aggressive intervention not required.
- Psychoeducation for family and school — the first step — nature of tics, ‘waxing and waning’, premonitory urge.
- Behavioral intervention — CBIT (Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics) AAN 2019 first-line recommendation (age 8+). HRT (Habit Reversal Training) + functional intervention + relaxation.
- Pharmacotherapy — when functional impairment is present and CBIT is unavailable or insufficiently effective:
- First-line: α2 adrenergic agonists — clonidine, guanfacine (ER) — side effect profile superior to antipsychotics; particularly beneficial in comorbid ADHD.
- Second-line: Atypical antipsychotic — aripiprazole (FDA-approved for Tourette syndrome, ages 6–18, 2014), risperidone, ziprasidone. Stronger anti-tic effect, but metabolic and EPS side effects.
- Third-line: typical antipsychotic — haloperidol, pimozide (FDA approval for Tourette, but EPS and QTc prolongation risk).
- In refractory cases — VMAT2 inhibitors (tetrabenazine off-label; deutetrabenazine and valbenazine under investigation for tics), botulinum toxin for focal tics.
- Comorbidity treatment — ADHD (stimulants do not significantly worsen tics – meta-analysis: Bloch M.H. et al. JAACAP 2009; but patients should be monitored), OCD (SSRI + CBT), anxiety, sleep.
- Refractory severe in Tourette's — Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) — thalamic centromedian-parafascicular or GPi (globus pallidus internus) targets; multidisciplinary selection in certified center (Schrock L.E. et al. Mov Disord 2015).
8.2 Pharmacotherapy — First-Line (α2-Agonists)
| Drug | Form | Dose range | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clonidine | IR / TDS (transdermal) | 0.05–0.3 mg/day (divided or TDS) | Sedation, hypotension; beneficial in comorbid ADHD cases. |
| Guanfacine ER | Long-term | 1–4 mg/day (once) | Less sedation, selective α2A; FDA-approved in ADHD. |
8.3 Second-Line (Atypical Antipsychotic)
| Drug | Dose range | Side effect profile |
|---|---|---|
| Aripiprazole | 2–20 mg/day | Akathisia, sedation; metabolic better. |
| Risperidone | 0.25–6 mg/day | Weight gain, prolactin elevation, EPS. |
| Ziprasidone | 20–80 mg/day | QT prolongation, EKG monitoring. |
8.4 Third-Line (Typical Antipsychotic)
- Haloperidol 0.5–4 mg/day — FDA approved for Tourette, but side effects: EPS, tardive dyskinesia, sedation.
- Pimozide 1–4 mg/day — FDA approval for Tourette; QTc prolongation, EKG mandatory.
8.5 Approach in Comorbid Conditions
- ADHD + tic: α2 agonist + stimulant or atomoxetine. Stimulants had a controversial history as a ‘tic enhancer’, but Bloch 2009 meta-analysis and the TACT (Tourette's Syndrome Study Group. Neurology 2002;58(4):527–536) — moderate-dose methylphenidate does not significantly exacerbate tics; monitor.
- OCD + tic: SSRI + ERP; adjunctive aripiprazole or risperidone.
- Sleep disorder: melatonin; clonidine also assists in the sleep component.
8.6 Source-Specific Clarifications
- AAN 2019 (Pringsheim Neurology 2019): CBIT first-line non-pharmacological; α2-agonists before antipsychotics (favorable side effect profile); dual benefit in comorbid ADHD.
- ESSTS 2022 (Müller-Vahl): In the European context; choice of CBIT and pharmacotherapy is individualized based on patient characteristics.
- Piacentini J. et al. JAMA 2010 (CBIT pivotal RCT): n=126, ages 9–17 — CBIT significantly superior to placebo (supportive therapy); reduction of 7.6 vs 3.5 points on YGTSS; effect size g = 0.68.
- Tourette Association of America Behavioral Sciences Consortium — Implementation of CBIT program and therapist training.
Treatment methods
- Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT) — Woods D.W., Piacentini J. — First-line non-pharmacological intervention (AAN 2019). Three core components: (1) Habit Reversal Training (HRT — recognition of premonitory sensation, learning competing behavior); (2) functional intervention (modifying contexts that reinforce tics); (3) relaxation training. Standard course — 8 individual sessions, 10 weeks; ongoing booster sessions. Evidence: Piacentini J. et al. JAMA 2010 RCT — pivotal study; Wilhelm S. et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012 RCT in adults; effect size moderate. tourette.org.
- Habit Reversal Training (HRT — Habit Reversal Training) — Azrin (Azrin N.H.), Nunn (Nunn R.G.) — Core component of CBIT — awareness training + competing response. Separate competing behavior for each tic (e.g., for neck jerking, holding neck centered).
- Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) for Tics — Alternative behavioral approach to HRT — patient learns to tolerate premonitory urge without responding with tic. Verdellen C.W. et al. Behav Res Ther 2004. ESSTS — alternative evidence-based behavioral method.
- Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS — Yale Global Tic Severity Scale) — Leckman (Leckman J.F.) et al., 1989 — Gold standard severity scale for tic disorders; separate counts for motor and vocal tics: frequency, intensity, complexity, interference level (0–5 points); global impairment 0–50. Baseline indicators and monitoring.
- Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS) — Woods D.W., Piacentini J — 9-item self-assessment; intensity of premonitory urge and its effect on intervention behavior.
- Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) — Surgical intervention for refractory severe Tourette; typical targets — thalamus (centromedian-parafascicular) and globus pallidus internus (GPi). Multidisciplinary selection; Schrock L.E. et al. Mov Disord 2015 international consensus.
- Botulinum Toxin — Injection into target muscle in focal motor (e.g., neck, lip, eye) and vocal tics; 3–4 month effect. Marras C. et al. Neurology 2001 RCT.
9. Prognosis
Good prognostic factors
- Typical tic disorder (distinct from rapid functional tic-like behavior).
- Mild-moderate YGTSS severity.
- Active management of comorbidity (ADHD, OCD).
- Early psychoeducation and family-school support.
- CBIT availability.
Poor prognostic factors
- Severe comorbidity (severe OCD, ADHD, anxiety, depression).
- Self-injurious tics (e.g., head banging).
- Social and academic limited adaptation.
- Refractory pharmacotherapy response.
Follow-up targets
- YGTSS every 3–6 months.
- Comorbidity (ADHD, OCD, anxiety, depression) — annual.
- Monitoring side effects (in those taking antipsychotics — metabolic, EPS, prolactin, QTc).
- Social and academic support.
- In adolescence, possibility of spontaneous remission; possibility of gradual reduction of pharmacotherapy.
- Support for occupation and relationships in adult patients.
10. Myths and misconceptions
10.1 Aetiology myths
Myth 1: “Tourette syndrome is always accompanied by coprolalia (swear words)”
Why it is widespread: In mass media (film, television), the portrayal of Tourette is almost always presented with coprolalia; sensational media choice.
Clinical and biological rationale: Coprolalia is the rare complex vocal tic form; neither motor nor vocal tics are obscene in most Tourette patients.
Evidence: Freeman R.D. et al. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009 — International Tourette Syndrome Association database n=597: coprolalia occurs in 19.3%, of males and 14.6% of females.
Real clinical step: Correct information to family and school; reducing patient's social stigma.
Myth 2: “Tourette's is a result of poor upbringing or parental mistakes”
Evidence: heritability 0.77 (Mataix-Cols JAMA Psychiatry 2015) — highest among psychiatric disorders. Genetic and neurobiological basis; parental experience not etiology.
Myth 3: “Tourette's is caused by emotional trauma or stress”
Clinical logic: Stress is not a cause of tic onset — tics are genetic and neurodevelopmental in origin. However, stress influences the severity of existing tics.
Myth 4: “All tics are PANDAS and must be treated with antibiotics”
Why it is widespread: In the 1990s, PANDAS (Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal infections) hypothesis by Susan Swedo and colleagues, and marketing by alternative clinics.
Clinical and biological rationale: Classic PANDAS clinical picture — rapid (hours-days) onset OCD/tics + emotional lability + post-streptococcal infection — is a rare event. Most tic patients show a typical course (gradual onset, waxing and waning).
Evidence: NIMH 2017 PANDAS/PANS clinical statement: routine antistreptolysin O testing or antibiotic prophylaxis in general tic disorders is not recommended; assessed only if a classic clinical picture is present. Routine use of IVIG and plasmapheresis is not evidence-based (only within clinical trials).
10.2 Harmful or erroneous methods
Myth 5: “Scolding or punishing a child harshly when they tic will make the tics go away”
Clinical logic: Tics can be partially voluntarily suppressed, but prolonged suppression leads to an increase in internal tension and subsequent “rebound” tic outbursts. Punishment does not reduce tics; on the contrary, it increases stress-related intensity.
Evidence: AAN 2019, ESSTS 2022 — tics are not voluntary behavior; punitive approach is ineffective and harmful.
Myth 6: “Antipsychotic haloperidol should be first-line in all tic patients”
Evidence: AAN 2019 (Pringsheim) — α2-agonists (clonidine, guanfacine) Before antipsychotics. It is recommended due to its favorable side effect profile. Haloperidol and pimozide are FDA-approved, but they have third-line status because of risks for EPS, tardive dyskinesia, sedation, prolactin, and QTc prolongation.
Myth 7: Stimulants cause tic explosions — stimulants are contraindicated for a Tourette patient with ADHD
Evidence: Bloch M.H. et al. JAACAP 2009 meta-analysis (n=9 RCTs, n=477) and TACT (Treatment of ADHD in Children with Tics; Tourette's Syndrome Study Group. Neurology 2002;58(4):527–536) — moderate-dose methylphenidate does not significantly exacerbate tics; in some patients even reduce tic severity. Comorbid ADHD constitutes the major part of functional impairment — considering stimulants as contraindicated is incorrect.
Real clinical step: In comorbid ADHD, start stimulant, monitor patient for tic severity; if exacerbation observed, reduce dose or α2-agonist + stimulant combination.
10.3 Ineffective or scientifically unfounded methods
Myth 8: Cannabis (medical marijuana) is an effective treatment for Tourette syndrome
Why it is widespread: anecdotal reports on social media, cannabis industry marketing, modest effects shown in some pilot studies.
Evidence: Müller-Vahl K.R. studies (small RCTs) — THC may partially reduce tics, but evidence base is insufficient for clinical recommendation. AAN 2019 — cannabinoids are not standard first-line; risk profile (psychosis risk in adolescents, cognitive effects, dependence) is significant. May be considered only in refractory adult cases and where national legislation permits.
Myth 9: “Special diet (gluten-free, casein-free) or avoidance of food additives eliminates Tourette's”
Evidence: No specific clinical evidence; AAP, AAN do not recommend.
Myth 10: “EEG neurofeedback reduces tics”
Evidence: Evidence base is limited; AAN 2019 — not first-line; CBIT is significantly superior.
Myth 11: “Vitamin mega-doses, omega-3, magnesium resolve tics”
Evidence: Efficacy of these supplements for Tourette has not been proven; AAN 2019 and ESSTS 2022 do not recommend.
Myth 12: “Acupuncture, homeopathy, craniosacral therapy cure Tourette's”
Evidence: Cochrane and systematic reviews — the effect of these complementary interventions for tic disorders has not been proven.
Myth 13: “Hypnotherapy or psychoanalytic therapy resolves tics”
Evidence: Was dominant until the 1960s, but shows no efficacy in modern evidence base; CBIT or pharmacotherapy is superior.
11. Sources
- WHO. ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. 8A05.0 Primary tics or tic disorders. 2024.
- American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5-TR. Washington DC: APA Publishing; 2022.
- Pringsheim T., Okun M.S., Müller-Vahl K. et al. Practice guideline recommendations summary: Treatment of tics in people with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders. Neurology 2019;92(19):896–906.
- Müller-Vahl K.R., Szejko N., Verdellen C. et al. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders — version 2.0. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022;31(3):403–423.
- Piacentini J., Woods D.W., Scahill L. et al. Behavior therapy for children with Tourette disorder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;303(19):1929–1937.
- Wilhelm S., Peterson A.L., Piacentini J. et al. Randomized trial of behavior therapy for adults with Tourette syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012;69(8):795–803.
- Leckman J.F., Riddle M.A., Hardin M.T. et al. The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale: initial testing of a clinician-rated scale of tic severity. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1989;28(4):566–573.
- Bloch M.H., Leckman J.F. Clinical course of Tourette syndrome. J Psychosom Res 2009;67(6):497–501.
- Bloch M.H., Panza K.E., Landeros-Weisenberger A., Leckman J.F. Meta-analysis: treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children with comorbid tic disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009;48(9):884–893.
- Freeman R.D. et al. Coprophenomena in Tourette syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009;51(3):218–227.
- Knight T., Steeves T., Day L. et al. Prevalence of tic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Neurol 2012;47(2):77–90.
- Mataix-Cols D., Isomura K., Pérez-Vigil A. et al. Familial risks of Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders: a population-based cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry 2015;72(8):787–793.
- Yu D., Sul J.H., Tsetsos F. et al. Interrogating the genetic determinants of Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders through genome-wide association studies. Am J Psychiatry 2019;176(3):217–227.
- Roessner V., Schoenefeld K., Buse J. et al. Pharmacological treatment of tic disorders and Tourette syndrome. Neuropharmacology 2013;68:143–149.
- Roessner V., Plessen K.J., Rothenberger A. et al. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. Part II: pharmacological treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;20(4):173–196.
- Tourette's Syndrome Study Group. Treatment of ADHD in children with tics: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2002;58(4):527–536.
- Pringsheim T., Ganos C., McGuire J.F. et al. Rapid Onset Functional Tic-Like Behaviors in Young Females During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mov Disord 2021;36(12):2707–2713.
- Schrock L.E., Mink J.W., Woods D.W. et al. Tourette syndrome deep brain stimulation: a review and updated recommendations. Mov Disord 2015;30(4):448–471.
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). PANDAS/PANS Information for Clinicians. 2017.
- Azrin N.H., Nunn R.G. Habit-reversal: a method of eliminating nervous habits and tics. Behav Res Ther 1973;11(4):619–628.