| ICD-11HA20 | SEXUAL PAIN-PENETRATION DISORDER (VAGINISMUS)Sexual pain-penetration disorder |
| ICD-10F52.5 | Nonorganic vaginismus |
| DSM-5-TRF52.6 | Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder |
1. Definition and nosology
Genito-pelvic pain / penetration disorder (ICD-11: HA20; DSM-5-TR Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder F52.6) — during penetration attempts: (a) difficulty, (b) genital or pelvic pain, (c) fear of pain, (d) tension of pelvic floor muscles. Classic vaginismus and dyspareunia are combined in this entity.
Duration ≥ 6 months; lifelong or acquired.
2. History
- Sims J.M. (1861) — description of vaginismus.
- Masters & Johnson (1970) — pelvic floor tension.
- DSM-5 (2013) — vaginismus and dyspareunia combined into GPPPD.
- ISSWSH and ACOG guidelines.
3. Epidemiology
- Prevalence in women is 5–17% (in clinical and non-clinical samples).
- Lifelong vaginismus — in young women, at first penetration attempt.
- Acquired — trauma, infection, atrophic vaginitis, post-surgery.
4. Aetiology and pathogenesis
- Biological — atrophic vaginitis (postmenopausal), vulvodynia, endometriosis, infection, surgical wound.
- Psychological — sexual trauma, anxiety, abstinence education, fear of pain.
- Relationship and partner factors.
5. Clinical features
- Reflexive tension of pelvic floor muscles during penetration.
- Pain (burning, stabbing).
- Penetration avoidance.
- Gynecological examination also difficult or impossible.
6. Diagnosis
6.1 Unified diagnostic criteria (DSM-5-TR)
A. At least one of the following:
- Difficulty in penetration;
- Pain in vulvovaginal or pelvic region during or attempted penetration.
- Fear of pain associated with anticipation of penetration.
- In attempted penetration, tension of the pelvic floor muscles.
B. Duration ≥ 6 months.
C. Distress.
6.2 Source-specific clarifications
- ISSWSH and ACOG.
6.3 Diagnostic algorithm
- Clinical interview (sexual history, pain characteristics, trauma).
- Careful gynecological examination — with caution, with patient consent.
- Vulvodynia screening (Q-type test).
- Infection, atrophic vaginitis, exception endometriosis.
- Pelvic floor assessment.
6.4 Differential diagnosis
| Condition | Distinguishing feature |
|---|---|
| Vulvodynia | Localized vulvar pain, Q-type positive. |
| Atrophic vaginitis | Postmenopausal, estrogen deficiency. |
| Endometriosis | Deep dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea. |
| Infection (candida, vaginosis) | Exudation, microbiological. |
7. Examination and assessment
- Gynecological examination.
- Pelvic floor assessment.
- FSFI; pain scales.
8. Treatment
- Multidisciplinary approach — pelvic floor physiotherapy + CBT + education.
- Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy — biofeedback, manual therapy, dilator therapy (gradual size increase).
- CBT and exposure therapy — fear of pain and avoidance; ter Kuile M.M. RCT.
- Sensate focus and couple therapy.
- Topical anesthetic (lidocaine) — in provoked vulvodynia (Goldstein A.T.).
- Local estrogen for atrophic vaginitis.
- Botulinum toxin A — in refractory vaginismus; evidence base is growing.
- Antidepressant/anticonvulsant (amitriptyline, gabapentin) — for neuropathic component.
Source-specific specifications
- ter Kuile M.M. et al. CBT vaginismus.
- Goldstein A.T. et al. ISSWSH vulvodynia consensus.
Treatment methods
- Dilator Therapy — Gradual increase in size; combined with relaxation.
- Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy — Biofeedback, manual therapy.
- CBT/Exposure — Fear of pain and avoidance.
- Topical Estrogen — Atrophic vaginitis.
- Botox (off-label) — For refractory vaginismus; selective.
9. Prognosis
With a multidisciplinary approach, prognosis is good (70–90%); in refractory cases, botox or intensive psychological intervention.
10. Myths and misconceptions
Myth 1: “Vaginismus is an emotional rejection of the partner”
Evidence: Reflex muscle tension — outside conscious control; accusing harmful.
Myth 2: “Vaginismus cannot be treated”
Evidence: CBT + dilator + physiotherapy combination 70–90% efficacy; ter Kuile RCTs.
Myth 3: “Treatment should be done to increase penetration frequency”
Evidence: target is reducing patient distress, restoring sense of control and choice; not a performance indicator.
Myth 4: “Local anesthetic is effective for all sexual pain”
Evidence: Effective in provoked vulvodynia; use limited in generalized vaginismus — main problem is muscle tension.
Myth 5: “Forcing ‘compulsory exercise’ helps with penetration attempts”
Evidence: urgent, painful repetition increases avoidance and fear; gradual, controlled exposure effective.
11. Sources
- WHO. ICD-11. HA20 Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder. 2024.
- APA. DSM-5-TR. 2022.
- Ter Kuile M.M. et al. Therapist-aided exposure for women with lifelong vaginismus: a RCT. J Consult Clin Psychol 2013;81(6):1127–1136.
- Goldstein A.T. et al. Vulvodynia: Assessment and Treatment. J Sex Med 2016;13(4):572–590.
- Bergeron S. et al. Genital pain in women and men: It can hurt more than your sex life. Sex Med Rev 2020.